UNOFFICAL RESULTS IN SAN FRANCISCO, CALIFORNIA
15 May 2007
One Comment
Thanks for your visit, We would also like to invite you in Tech At Hand
(SOURCE: CONSULATE GENERAL reported by CESAR TORRES from OFW-News Yahoo Groups
UNOFFICAL RESULTS IN SAN FRANCISCO, CALIFORNIA
Registered Voters: 4,844; No of Votes: 1190; Counted: 1,161; Invalid: 29
Territorial Coverage: No. California, Alaska, Utah, Colorado, Wyming, Montana, Washington, Oregon, No. Nevada, Idaho
(COMPARISON: Los Angeles: 650 Registered Voters, 250 Voted; Honolulu: 150 Registered Voters, Less than 50 Voted)
SENATORIABLES
- PANGILINAN 793
- VILLAR 676
- RECTO 670
- ARROYO 663
- LEVISTE-LEGARDA 655
- AQUINO, NO-NO 647
- ESCUDERO 538
- DEFENSOR 528
- ANGARA 513
- LACSON 466
- CAYETANO TISOY 453
- ZUBIRI 420
- MAGSAYSAY 417
- PIMENTEL 412
- ROCO 411
- PICHAY 306
- HONASAN 305
- SOTTO 288
- COSETENG 273
- SINGZON 263
- TRILLANES 255
- ORETA 203
- KIRAM 77
- CAYETANO DAVAO 37
PARTY LIST WITH SIGNFICANT VOTES
- BAYAN MUNA 47
- CIBAC 47
- SENIOR CITIZENS 40
- GABRIELA 36
- AKBAYAN 31
- A TEACHER 30
- ABAKADA 30
- KALAHI 27
- AGBIAG 22
24.57 % Voters turn out is not that bad.
It’s very disappointing to know that Pangilinan became your number one for the senatoriable race..
I dono..maybe you aren’t well informed about he’s position and on what he did during the previous presidential election when FPJ runs for president.. perhaps you do not want FPJ to win also that is why you were made to believe about how well he acted during those days..hearing..I still believe that the truth should have prevailed and the proclaimed president should have been the voice of the PEOPLE..
Just an insight..your 5-year old neighbor approaches you and said that your daughter took her lollipop and she has proof that it really belongs to her..would you listen to her and give back to her the lollipop or just don’t mind it coz it’s “nothing” or “useless” to deal with coz they are just “kids”..
Mr. Pangilinan didn’t even bother to listen to Mr. FPJ’s plea..why?? I don’t know.. and I definitely disagree to what he claims for himself as the “PRINCIPLED” man!!!
[Reply]
Leave your response!